Friday, November 22, 2013

Blog 9: EQ

1) I reviewed the rule of three for writing an EQ.

2)
 a.  What is the most important factor in healthy weight loss?
The EQ above does not meet the rule of three. It is not a yes or no question by wanting to know the most important factor,  thought is required.  The second criteria is where the questions breaks down, it will require statistical data to support one definitive answer and much recitation of facts. Third criteria is met with a definitive question.
 b.  What is most important to securing a conviction in a criminal investigation?
The EQ above meets the rule of three.  It is not a yes or no question, by wanting to know the  most important factor, thought is required.  Criteria two is meet as the argument can be made for one pivotal piece of evidence can insure a conviction.  The wording is clear and meets criteria three.
 c.  What is most important in creating a hairstyle that best satisfies a customer?
The EQ does not meet the rule of three.  It is not a yes or no question by wanting to the the most important factor, however it is difficult to do in depth research on this.   The second criteria is meet because you can have two people arguing hair color and style are the best, when someone could be arguing that communication is the best.  It is specific and the wording makes sense, therefore it meets criteria three.
 d.  How can an Anesthesiologist best treat chronic pain?
The EQ does meet the rule of three.  It is not a yes or no question and research will be in abundance.  Criteria two is meet as it allows different areas of treatment to be examined and will allow real life experience to be part of the project.  Criteria three is meet asking for a specific answer.

3)  What is the best way to optimize your stage for successful production?


No comments:

Post a Comment